Skip to content

Sandeep v. State of Haryana

Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 302 r/w. 34 – Arms Act, 1959 – S. 25 – The trajectory of the entry of the bullet as found in the Medical Report is also quite consistent with the version that the deceased was shot from a height i.e. the roof of the house. Considering the material on record including the eyewitness’s account as well as the corroborative pieces of material, it is firmly established that the accused P fired the fatal shot from the roof of the house. The involvement of accused-P is thus beyond any doubt. AIR 2021 SC 4105 : JT 2021 (9) SC 68 : 2021 (9) SCALE 724

Rajinder Goel v. High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Service Law – Judicial Service – Administrative Committee – Compulsory Retirement from the Post of Additional District and Sessions Judge – there were multiple transactions showing deposits and withdrawals of substantial amounts of money, it cannot be said that the Full Court was not justified in taking the view that it did – do not find any reason to take a different view in the matter. AIR 2021 SC 3778 : JT 2021 (7) SC 215 : 2021 (9) SCALE 6