Home » Seniority

Seniority

Anand Kumar Tiwari v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2017 (Madhya Pradesh) -Rule 11 – the Petitioners are not entitled to the relief of the 2017 Rules being given retrospective effect. According to Rule 11 (1) of the 2017 Rules, the relative seniority of members of service working on the date of commencement of the Rules shall not be disturbed. The roster shall be prepared and maintained only after the commencement of operation of the Rules. The Petitioners cannot claim that their seniority has to be reworked on the basis of roster. AIR 2021 SC 3898 : 2021 (8) SCALE 518

Service Law – Seniority – As and when the question of fixing the seniority is examined by the State Government the persons who are likely to be affected be heard. 

  • Uncategorized

Service Law – Seniority – As and when the question of fixing the seniority is examined by the State Government the persons who are likely to be affected be heard. Read More »Service Law – Seniority – As and when the question of fixing the seniority is examined by the State Government the persons who are likely to be affected be heard. 

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]