Child in Conflict with Law v. State of M.P.
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2006 – Rejection of Bail – Revision – Maintainability. 2022 Cri.L.J. 2358
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2006 – Rejection of Bail – Revision – Maintainability. 2022 Cri.L.J. 2358
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Ss. 362 & 482 – High Court is vested with the power to modify any condition imposed by a Magistrate while passing an order of bail.
Evidence Law – Law relating to a testimony of a child witness – Following factors must be considered at the time of recording of evidence of a child witness :- (i) There is no disqualification for a child witness; (ii) The Court must conduct a preliminary enquiry before allowing a child witness to be examined; (iii) The Court must be satisfied about the mental capability of a child before giving evidence; (iv) While sifting the evidence, the possibility of a bias or the child being tutored should be taken note of; (v) The evidence of a child witness should be corroborated; (vi) The child cannot be administered oath or affirmation and it is incompetent to do so; (vii) The Court cannot allow a minor to make an affirmation.
Service Law – Reservation – Granting reservation to a woman is a special provision of reservation and would be implemented in the manner in which a horizontal reservation is implemented. The concept of migration from one category to another on the basis of merit may hold good in vertical reservation, but in horizontal reservation the same is not applicable.Read More »Sachin Pathak v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of Gujarat (2002)10 <b>SCC</b> 283, whereby the Court held that whatever be the situation … case of Union of India… Read More »Smt. Minakshi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 July, 2021
case of Arjun vs. State of Chhatisgarh- 2017 3 <b>SCC</b> 247, the conviction has been altered from … Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory of Chandigarh… Read More »Satish vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 July, 2021
State of Haryana reported in 2014 Vol.-14 <b>SCC</b> 646). 26. The necessity for careful scrutiny of dying declaration Click to rate this post! [Total: 1… Read More »Raghuram @ Reghoram vs State Of M.P. on 31 July, 2021
Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors. (2018) 1 <b>SCC</b> 268 and directed the respondents to consider the representation … Anil Bharadwaj Vs. High Court… Read More »Sanjay Chouhan vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 July, 2021
State of Bihar and Another , AIR (2009) 8 <b>SCC</b> 751 & Sheila Sebastian vs. R. Jawaharaj & another … <b>SCC</b> 581. Signature Not Verified… Read More »Smt. Anjani Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 July, 2021
Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel v. Union of India , (1995) 4 <b>SCC</b> 51. In Kamleshkumar (supra), the Apex Court was dealing with … India v. D.J.… Read More »Ashish Bhale vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 July, 2021