Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Section 55 – Police to take charge of articles seized and delivered – Compliance of – Officer in-charge of the police station shall take charge of the articles and keep them in safe custody until the same are delivered for FSL examination or delivered by orders of the Magistrate. Hence it is a clear mandate which is required to be followed and regarding compliance of this provision the witnesses have made casual statements – Conviction against the appellants is not sustainable.
Chhattisgarh High Court
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 13(1)(ia) – Martial Cruelty – A decree for divorce can be granted on the ground of cruelty, however, the word ‘cruelty’ has not been defined under the Act, 1955, therefore, the question as to what act or omission or conduct or behavior of a party to a marriage would constitute cruelty has to be understood in the facts and circumstances of each case.
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 153A, 295A, 505(2) 188 – Quashing of FIR – Accused in her Facebook ID, posted objectionable material because of which, religious sentiments of complainant have been hurt – it was not the original written post by the accused – From perusal for the FIR, it is crystal clear that the said post is already in public domain and lot of news channels were also broadcasting the same – FIR is liable to be quashed. 2021 Cri. L.J. 3894
Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966 (Chhattisgarh) – Rule 27 (2) – Consideration of Appeal – Appellate Authority has failed to consider and decide the appeal in accordance with Rule 27(2) of the Rules of 1966 and did not assign any cogent reason as to whether the findings of the Disciplinary Authority are justified or not and punishment is appropriate or excessive and it requires interference, as such the Appellate Authority has failed to perform its duty in deciding the appeal in accordance with Rule 27(2) of the Rules of 1966. Read More »D.L. Divyakar v. State of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPURWrit Petition (S) No.799 of 2010Mehandi Hussain, S/o Shri Munshiram Ansari, aged about42 years, R/o Mominpura, Ambikapur, District Surguja(CG) PetitionerVersusChhattisgarh State… Read More »Mehandi Hussain v. State of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURWPS No. 4094 of 2010Bhagwani Ram Bhatpahri, S/o Late Shri LuduramBhatpahri, Aged about 44 years, R/o Village Jounda,Post Kond Thana… Read More »Bhagwani Ram Bhatpahri v. State of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.776 of 2010 Order reserved on: 26-7-2021 Order delivered on: 2-8-2021 Rajesh Singh Shrivastava, S/o Shri Hoshiyar… Read More »Rajesh Singh Shrivastava v. State of Chhattisgarh
Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. [(2014) 2 <b>SCC</b> 1] by a Constitution Bench. There is no such provision … Moreover, it is ordered to… Read More »Devlal Bharti vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 2 August, 2021